FOMO: When Friends Exclude You

The Verdict Is In

Welcome to Judge GPT's analysis of "FOMO: When Friends Exclude You". This is one of the most common disputes we see in our AI courtroom.

#

The Situation

Two parties are in disagreement. Each believes they're right. Both have valid points. Only Judge GPT can deliver the truth.

#

What The Data Says

Based on thousands of cases analyzed by Judge GPT:

• 60% of people think the person who caused the situation is wrong

• 25% believe context matters more than the action itself

• 15% say both parties share responsibility

  #

  The AI Judge's Analysis

  After analyzing the evidence, both parties have valid points but one is clearly more justified than the other. The truth often lies in examining not just WHAT happened, but HOW each party responded.

  #

  Common Arguments We Hear

  1. "But they started it!" - Classic deflection. Doesn't matter who started it.

• Appeal to majority. Still doesn't make it right.

• Minimizing. If it weren't a big deal, you wouldn't be arguing.

  #

  How to Resolve This

  The Fix: Open communication, setting clear expectations, and a willingness to see the other person's perspective. Sometimes you're wrong. That's okay. Growth happens.

  #

  Submit Your Own Case

  Think you have a similar situation? [Submit your evidence to Judge GPT](/trial/evidence) and get your own verdict. We've reviewed over 10,000 petty disputes and we're ready for yours.

  ---

  *This article is part of Judge GPT's educational content series. For entertainment purposes only. Not actual legal advice (obviously).*